| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Zaimat Dev. Team

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 350 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: Ship classes |
|
|
How many ship classes do you find essential (in a game) or realistic (to some extent) in a fleet. For example in Master of Orion 2 you could build 6 classes of ships (hull sizes) and fighters/bombers/shuttles were not even included.
In popular shows such as Babylon5, Star Trek and others typically you have command/mothership/carriers or huge explorer ships, large cruiser/destroyer/survey types with few or no fighters of their own, medium or transport size ships for supplies/moving troops etc and small fighters.
I personally favor 4 (perhaps 5 if a race could build something like a planet destroyer as the vorlons had). It makes it simpler for the player to manage/recognize at a glance on the screen.
I originally considered having variable ship sizes (set by the player at ship designing) but this was not feasible when we started development so I did not give it further thought and left to ponder for a future version. _________________ Horizon - Lead Designer |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Therlun Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 137 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i would like:
-fighters (need carriers to travel between systems)
-patrol boats (for defensive tasks [police] and fleet scouting )
-destroyers/escorts (defensive and support tasks in a fleet and trade escorts)
-cruisers (as "small" battleships, long range explorers, flagships of smaller forces, and as lone trade interrupters)
-flagships (the heavy battleships, flagships of big fleets and carriers)
the most important thing is that every class has its uses though.
in moo2 i never ever have built the smallest two sizes except for scouts in the beginning, and rarely have built the third largest size. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Anguille Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 70 Location: Bern, Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
My list is slightly different
- fighters (i love battlestar Galactica, Babylon 5, Star Wars and another tv show i don't remember the name where the pilots where also troopers).
- Bombers (larger than fighters for tactical attack) and sensor ships
- Supply ships (troops, fuel) and civilian ships (diplomatic ships, trade)
- Destroyers (medium class as support or escort for the larger ships but rather useles on their own)
- Battleships (can perform missions alone: no fighters but heavy weapons and sensors)
- Flagships (carriers with heavy weapons like Battlestar Galactica) _________________ I may not post so much...but i am here watching! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
ForesterSOF Vanguard

Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Borg occupied Terra
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the Trasport area I would add a ship to move colonist from a more populated area to a less one. _________________ You have two choices in life; Explore and Learn, or Vegetate |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
DeckPrism Vanguard

Joined: 06 Oct 2004 Posts: 33 Location: Near Washington D.C.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At least: fighters, 2 classes of main ship, and "thats not a moon" awe inspiring size.
The question of role ties into this as each class should have a reason(s) for being. I could see both fighters and the small ship size used for scouts. I can see the small ship size used as destroyer/cruisers and cloaked subs. I can see the small ship size able to carry at most 2 fighters. I can see the large ship size filling the roles of battleship, carrier, colony, and large cloaked missile sub. I can see the moon size acting as a carrier to destroyers, being a carrier itself, and being an uber battleship all in one. I would expect the moon size to be a singular end game achievement for most races, and a major show of superiority from the ancient race or two. I can also see the moon size as a base for a wandering or exiled race; a battle colony.
If for some reason you dispense with fighters, then you ought to have 3 main ship classes. You could add a third main ship class anyway, but that starts to get cluttered in my opinion since in a game I often don't have a good reason to have a mix of ship sizes. _________________ Do not let light shine upon your opponent's mind through a hole in your body. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Therlun Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 137 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont like the "moon sized"/death star thingy...
it seems so "uninspired".
it should certainly not be a standard ships size IMO |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
DeckPrism Vanguard

Joined: 06 Oct 2004 Posts: 33 Location: Near Washington D.C.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Space, and the games we play in our imaginations there, seems to me to be about mystery and awe. It may be a cliche, but a moon size ship does that. I agree that they should not be a standard ship size. But if you bump into an ancient race's homeworld I don't think you should think toyourself "They have a big fleet with lots of tech, I think I can beat them latter tonight." No, I think you should say to yourself "Zounds what a big fleet with uber tech and it that moon moving toward me!? Yikes, if I survive I definately do not want to mess with them any time soon." Toward that end I further propose that moon size ships not be destroyable, but only be rendered useless. In other words, for every moon size ship in the game there should either be the active ship, or a big relic as testament to an amazing battle. _________________ Do not let light shine upon your opponent's mind through a hole in your body. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Zaimat Dev. Team

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 350 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the ship roles aren't tied to size/class of the ship by the game. And the AI doesn't distinguish ships by their size but mostly their function and design (when they scan you) while encountering your or other race ships.
And you can name them as you see fit.
So with that said
You don't build an escort ship
You build instead an escort design on a medium sized class ship
You can also build it on a large size class ship
Why one or the other? Because smaller class ships have faster initiative (and other bonuses) in combat while larger ships have more room for weapons/instruments/specials and more hit points but far more expensive and more vulnerable in many ways. _________________ Horizon - Lead Designer |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
ForesterSOF Vanguard

Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 34 Location: Borg occupied Terra
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So I would put a Transport design on a ship of my chosing and have a person transport. _________________ You have two choices in life; Explore and Learn, or Vegetate |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Zaimat Dev. Team

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 350 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. You would put a colonizer pod module on the ship design and that would make it into a colonizer capable ship.
Or outfit an empty cargo space with ground troop quarters module to make that medium sized ship a troop transport vessel (or just one of the things it can do).
On a side note since you raised it. There are no plans for making population transports atm. I don't find it particularly realistic to move millions of people from one planet to another easily. And also causes balance issues easily exploitable, Horizon uses "realistic" population numbers. A new colony wouldn't have 1/20 of homeworld. But more like 1,000/1,000,000,000. _________________ Horizon - Lead Designer |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Jambi Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zaimat wrote: |
| Well the ship roles aren't tied to size/class of the ship by the game. |
I like this approach. I prefer that size not necessarily be linked to ship class and instead be linked to technology. Some games have taken it too far (MOO3).
If you could clarify your above post for me. Are you asking how many size classes or how many role classes should be present?
Fighters/Bombers - Should be setup as a weapons system.
*Classes*
Scout/Destroyer - multi-role ship. Possibilties include scout/recon, limited screening/Point Defense capabilities.
Corvette/Cruiser - Comprehensive screening/Point Defense capabilities, interdiction, also adaptable to various support roles.
Battle Type Ship - Backbone of fleet, main combat ship, can carry any weapons system.
Flag/Command Ship - Would be similar to main battleships except larger, more expensive version that are more heavily armed and armored. Ship would impart operating bonuses to its fleet.
If support/supply/troop ships will be in the game then I suppose a serperate class may be warranted but it could always be pulled from one of the above classes, perhaps the Corevette class would suite those roles as it's somewhat of all-a-round workhorse ship.
Just my two cents,
Jambi |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Jambi Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just reading through the galaxy section of the website and realized the ship classes are already setup similar to what I was talking about. That's what I get for not reading through more sections of the site.  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Zaimat Dev. Team

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 350 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes I wanted to get feedback on size classes to see if it coincided more or less with our current ship design screen. The roles are not defined by size except perhaps fighters types (smallest size ships) which can be launched from carriers.
"Fighters/Bombers - Should be setup as a weapons system. "
In moo2 they were weapons (like missiles), wouldn't it be better as actual individual ships rather than clumped as one unit. We've gone with the idea that it is, unless it causes problems (we can switch it if it did but so far looks good) I think players will like it better. _________________ Horizon - Lead Designer |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Jambi Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: United States
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zaimat wrote: |
| In moo2 they were weapons (like missiles), wouldn't it be better as actual individual ships rather than clumped as one unit. We've gone with the idea that it is, unless it causes problems (we can switch it if it did but so far looks good) I think players will like it better. |
I think that it is a good idea depending on how many fighters need to be controlled. My first thought about it whether or not it will be overwhelming to have to control hundreds of fighters as well as the main fleet. I'm sure you've thought about that and have a good system in place.
Thoughts...
How many fighters will be on the field of battle?
Will each fighter be controlled individually?
Can fighters be grouped, ie. fighter group 1, group 2, ect.
One thing I liked about MOO3 was the number of fighters I could field, it really gave me a sense of enormity(sp?) to battles ala star wars. What I did not like was my lack of control of the fighters during battle.
I suppose what I would love is to have controllable groups of fighters. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
DeckPrism Vanguard

Joined: 06 Oct 2004 Posts: 33 Location: Near Washington D.C.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Modern carriers carry 40-50 fighters and the US has/had about 10 carriers? In MOO3 one of the reasons you got such big fighter swarms was because of the task force(TF) system which tended to cause you to have around 10 core carriers per carrier armada. Then you could have 10 TFs per side. 10x10x?? = a lot of fighters. Horizon is going for a smaller number of ships as a design descision IIRC. So I'd be suprised to see MOO3 size swarms and maybe even suprised to see as many fighters as the US Navy has now spread across an empire.
edit: Some people say that there are mods or patches which improve MOO3 fighters, so you might look back into it. _________________ Do not let light shine upon your opponent's mind through a hole in your body. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Jambi Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DeckPrism wrote: |
| Modern carriers carry 40-50 fighters and the US has/had about 10 carriers? In MOO3 one of the reasons you got such big fighter swarms was because of the task force(TF) system which tended to cause you to have around 10 core carriers per carrier armada. Then you could have 10 TFs per side. 10x10x?? = a lot of fighters. Horizon is going for a smaller number of ships as a design descision IIRC. So I'd be suprised to see MOO3 size swarms and maybe even suprised to see as many fighters as the US Navy has now spread across an empire. |
I"ll buy that and if what you say is correct then I think I will enjoy space battles in Horizon. More/Bigger is not always better.
| Quote: |
| edit: Some people say that there are mods or patches which improve MOO3 fighters, so you might look back into it. |
I've got the patches and they do help, unfortunately the fighters are still uncontrolable, they can't be made any other way. I still play MOO3 and there has been a lot of hardwork and effort put into the game by some very talented and dedicated people. MOO3 has had life breathed back into. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Jambi Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zaimat wrote: |
| Yes I wanted to get feedback on size classes to see if it coincided more or less with our current ship design screen. |
Fewer size classes are better. How many do you really need anyways. I think that most people end up using only 4-6 ship hull sizes in games that offer many options. MOO3 has ~15 hull sizes and I still only used 3-4 at any one time. The only thing being different is what I'm capable of building at the time, the smaller sizes eventually become obsolete. From the sounds of it you seem to prefer a MOO 1 type of approach of limited size options, so do I and I say run with it! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Warcaster Explorer

Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think the ideal is 4 classes
small (corvette/frigate) -fast and manuverable, cant mount much but is
harder to hit
medium (destroyer/cruiser) - slower than the smaller class but still nimble
carries a bigger punch (ideal for deep
patrols, dangerous scouting roles and more
importantly fleet defense)
large (battleship /dreadnaught) - slow and cumbersome they form the
back of any large scale attack. meant
primarily as ordnance carriers or super
heavy weapons platforms these can
soak up all but the most brutal of attacks
Special (moonsize etc) - this i believe should be (as has been said) the
crowning achievement of an empire. nigh on
impregnable these behemoths spell doom for all
but the strongest of opponents.
i like the idea of giving fighters/bombers orders ( and therefore qualifying as a 5th class) but i can forsee issues with co-ordinating the fighters while still attempting to manage the cap ships. i used to play the babylong 5 mod for star trek armada and it was always a tos up as to whether to send the fighters into the fray and leave them while i directed the caps or risk not utilizing the full effect of the caps because i was bogged down with fighter duties.
personally i fell the best choice would be to have the fighters as a directed weapon. ie when you select a carrier it has a button that allows you to set orders for any fighter that is launched from her.
eg i select carrier A and click on the 'fighter orders' button, i then select a 'intercept ordnance' button. the affect is that any and all fighters launched (automatically) intercept enemy ordnance. say i then want them to attack the enemy carrier. i once again select Carrier A and the 'fighter ordnance' then 'attack' and select the enemy carrier.
dont know if it can be done or if anyone agrees but thats how i'd like to see it.
Warcaster |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Zaimat Dev. Team

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 350 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
We had originally 4 size ship classes designed.
After reading your feedback/comments we made fighters as their own seperate class. Thus there are now 4 ship size classes that you will be able to design + fighters.
Fighter sized ships were made into a special (fighters bay) that can be outfit onto a carrier. Each fighters bay will be able to carry a complement of 5 fighters.
Each fighter is an individual ship, the number of fighters on a carrier form a squadron and are controlled by the carrier. They are not replenished if destroyed until your carrier returns to a base.
Our view of combat will be more alongside how it's been done in typical combat in Babylon5, Star trek etc. By this I mean, a carrier on it's own (with the fighters) is quite powerful. A taskforce comprised of up to 10 ships is considered a fleet and a major force with only major races being able to field them. _________________ Horizon - Lead Designer |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Anguille Vanguard

Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 70 Location: Bern, Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like what i read....keep it up Zaimat  _________________ I may not post so much...but i am here watching! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
|